Politics is raw in Britain today. Remainers rage against Brexiters and vice versa. Pensioners are set against millennials; nationalists against immigrants; populists against elites; rural traditionalists against city liberals. Party politics is characterised by contempt and dogma. To his many enemies, Jeremy Corbyn is an extremist and will never be a legitimate national leader. To Corbynistas, his internal critics are bad losers and traitors to Labour. To many non-Tory voters and MPs, Theresa May’s government is an immoral experiment in austerity and pandering to prejudice. On seemingly every fundamental issue, the country feels even more divided than it did in the turbulent 70s and 80s. There are furious battles over free speech, minority rights, the size of the state, the shape of the economy, social and cultural values, even the truth and selection of relevant political facts. In many other democracies, from the US to Italy to Australia, politics has become just as tribal, fragmented and apparently out of control. Opposing factions no longer seem able to talk to each other, or even to agree on what they might talk about. For the many voters who dislike confrontation and feel that democracy should be about dialogue and compromise, the new… Read full this story
- David French, Sohrab Ahmari, and the Battle for the Future of Conservatism
- Jang hasn’t delivered on his 10-point agenda – Damishi Sango
- The Mystery of Rudy Giuliani’s Moral Decline Isn’t Such a Mystery at All
- King Fahd of Saudia Arabia
- Frenemies? Polarizing Donald Trump vs. The Ruthless Centrism of Emmanuel Macron
- Why Afghanistan's past is being 'rewritten'
- US Should Work Together With Russia to End Afghan Crisis - Scholar
The death of consensus: how conflict came back to politics have 270 words, post on www.theguardian.com at September 20, 2018. This is cached page on IT Breaking News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.